More humane methods of research need to be employed. Is there any reason that we need to develop a new shade of lipstick if we already have enough shades available? Financial losses are huge even for common dissection classes.
The struggle always seems to be between extremist animal rights activists who believe that animals should never be used for research, and scientists who believe that any use of animals is acceptable.
It is against all ethical norms to test new medicine on people and risk their lives. Reduction, Refinement and Replacement The mentioned three RRRs reduction, refinement and replacement represent a plan developed by numerous countries to ensure the decrease in the testing with the use of animals.
Phil Boerner, n. The provided data prove to be accurate; however, living organisms cannot be replaced with less complex computer programs which do not ensure simulation of the brain activity.
Actually, there is hardly any effective alternative to animal testing.
However, because of animal testing,dogs, 50, cats, 60, primates, 1. Is a human being more important than an animal just because it is of a different species. The result basically stated that penicillin could be used as a treatment for penicillin when the mice dosed with penicillin survived.
Without animal research, many human beings would now be dead.