Ending the war against japan essay

The War in Europe ended on May 8, It might be argued that, following the explosions, Japan virtually disappeared from the world stage while the USSR viewed the bombing as an incentive to acquire the same weaponry in order to retaliate in equal force if the atomic bomb was ever used again. Scientists from all around America, and later Tube Alloys, which was their British counterpart, came together to form one of the most powerful weapons of all time If communist Russia were allowed to gain territory in east Asia, it would throw its considerable military might behind Mao, almost certainly handing the communists a victory once the World War was ended and the civil war was resumed.

Ending the war against japan essay

This freed up resources that could be utilised for the war effort elsewhere. A third reason or is whether or not the use of atomic weapons on innocent people was worth the media backlash. Therefore, the US created unconditional terms of surrender, knowingly going against the Japanese ethic of honour and against the institute of the emperor, whom most Americans probably wanted dead. The scientist from Ernest Rutherford who is from New Zealand to German, British, Japanese, and other scientist from across the globe all contributed to nuclear physics and research on the atom. However, it did not stop the USSR from creating the same weapon within four years. In other words, the Russian system seemed to be working while the American system was plagued with recent collapse and a questionable self-confidence. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. But how and why were the atomic bombs created? Are other countries making the same bomb?

The devastation caused by the bombs sped up the Japanese surrender, which was the best solution for all parties. In Februarythe Japanese military conducted a survey that concluded that Japan could not win the war.

Why did japan refuse to surrender in ww2

It is certainly true that Stalin and the Soviets tried to test US dominance, but even into the s the US generally came out on top. Pacific Fleet, reflected this reality when he wrote, "The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. Then, during the Great Depression, when the U. The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the War at all. The U. The use of weapons of mass destruction causing the incineration of large swaths of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in quick succession backed up that threat, highlighting the futility of continuing the war. The question of military necessity can be quickly put to rest. Army Air Forces, meant when he observed, "The Japanese position was hopeless even before the first atomic bomb fell because the Japanese had lost control of their own air. Some believe the Aug. The fate of the czar at the hands of communists, and prospects for a punitive Soviet occupation, influenced the calculus of surrender.

The United States had decided that they will only accept an unconditional surrender from the Japanese. Truman had the tremendous decision that could and would change life forever.

was the atomic bomb necessary to end ww2

Roy: The price to keep the USSR in check was steep: the use of a weapon of mass destruction that caused arounddeaths most of them civilians and massive suffering through radiation.

This freed up resources that could be utilised for the war effort elsewhere.

Rated 9/10 based on 75 review
World War Two and the Atomic Bomb Essay